Showing posts with label what to eat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label what to eat. Show all posts

Monday, October 25, 2010

Health Reform Law and your favorite lunch spot....


If you think the health care reform bill had nothing to do with your lunch, think again. A little noticed national calorie labeling rule tucked into the legislation assures that within a couple of years, everyone who walks into a chain restaurant will see calories counts displayed alongside the price of a meal.

The public health concept is twofold. Making restaurants post calorie counts might drive them to compete with healthier menu items instead of just on price and taste. And if customers learn that a Whopper is 670 calories and a caramel Frappucino is 380, they might make different choices.

New Yorkers have been living with highly visible calorie counts on chain restaurant menus for a couple of years. The results have been mixed at best.

Although the federal law is based largely on the one designed by the New York City Health Department, there are difference.
The rules about where the calories counts have to be at drive-through menus have been tightened. And the law only applies to chains with 20 restaurants or more. The New York law applies to chains with at least 15 restaurants. The change was requested by the National Restaurant Association, which wanted uniform standards nationwide.

Sixteen other states and localities have passed similar laws, and more are pending. The national law will supersede the local laws. So the Centers for Science in the Public Interest, which began a campaign for nutrition labeling at restaurants seven years ago, is suggesting people who worked for the fast food calorie labeling law turn their attention to getting calorie counts listed at cafeterias in hospitals and government buildings.

Reprinted from The New York Times, Kim Severson 3/23/10

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Lunch


I'll just grab something fast!


How about an Arby's Ultimate BLT Market Fresh Sandwich. Sounds good, the "Market Fresh" is a nice touch. Let's see, how does *880 calories, *46 grams of fat (10 saturated) and *1740 mg of sodium sound for lunch?


How about Subway's Footlong Marina Meatball Sandwich? It shouldn't be a shock that it's bad, but how bad can it be? Hmmm, how does *1160 calories, *46 grams of fat (18 g saturated, 2 trans) and over *3000 mg of sodium sound? Yummy, even if you cut this one into a 6" your in trouble!


I have been good this week, I'll have a burger at Chili's. I'll take the Chili's Smokehouse Bacon Cheese Burger. I mean I know it's bad, but, I'll get back to the "diet" stuff tomorrow. So that's *1900 calories, *138 grams of fat (47 gr saturated) and 4200 mg of sodium.


Any one of these "lunches" and thousands of others just like them, just once a week, could wreck your efforts to lose weight and be healthy. Learn what you are eating, fix your own meals and stay away from the "cheat meals".

Monday, February 15, 2010

Eating Out















Got to grab a quick lunch out?


Ask for:

  • No Cheese


  • Grilled


  • No Mayo


  • Wheat Bread


  • No Oil


Stay away from:


  • Crispy (=fried)


  • Fried


  • Special Sauce (?)


  • "Creamy" Dressings


  • Cheese

  • Hotdogs



  • Processed Meat

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Cops and FASTFOOD



Ever wonder what your eating when you grab that burger and fries for that quick lunch?

How bad can it be? Is it ok to hit the drive through just a couple of times a week?

You might be surprised. Its not all bad, things are changing, most restaurants are making the nutritional value of their food available to the consumer. However, some food establishments have refused to list the nutritional information. You have to ask yourself why they would want to do that; don't you think you have a right to now what you are eating? Sure you do.

Quiznos has been a notorious example of this only recently listing the calories of a select few menu items, choosing not to show fat, sodium or other content.

Lets take a quick look at a couple of meals:
Meal #1: Whataburger, lg Fries, md shake
Whataburger, no cheese- 607 calories, 29.9g of fat, 1,158mg of sodium
Large Fries- 514 calories, 26g of fat, 413mg of sodium
32oz Vanilla Shake- 834 calories, 25g of fat, 449mg of sodium
This one meal as a total of 1955 calories, 80.9g of fat and 2020mg of sodium. Whata-Size it and add 275 calories and 15g of fat! It doesn't take a dietitian to realize that this is not going to be a good choice, but how many people eat something like that several times a week, what about everyday?
Meal #2: McDonald's Premium Grilled Chicken Sandwich, md coke
Sandwich calories-420, 17g fat, 1470mg sodium
Medium Coca Cola- 210 calories
This meal is a bit better, but still not the "diet meal" that some would like to think with 630 calories, 17g fat and 1470 sodium.
As you can see both of these meals are very high in sodium and would be very detrimental for anyone with high blood pressure or on a low sodium diet. As for the fat, the burger combo contains way too much fat with a large percentage coming from saturated fat. The addition of fries sends it over the edge.
The grilled chicken sandwich is better, it gets about 21% of its calories from fat, which is acceptable and it is low in saturated fat. You did know that a medium coke as over 200 calories of pure HIGH FRUCTROSE CORN SYRUP, right? If you must frequent "Fast Food" restaurants then take sometime to research the nutritional information for their menus. Don't just think that this is a problem at fast food restaurants, it is a common theme anywhere, even real sit down eateries.
http://www.whataburger.com/browse_nutritional_info.php http://www.mcdonalds.com/usa/eat/nutrition_info.html